Mazda 626 1999 vs Mazda 3 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 167 HP | 105 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 145 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12.5 seconds | 6.1 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.9 | 4.4 - 9.6 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 14 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1360 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 21 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`648 | ~ 1`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |