Mazda 626 1999 vs Honda Civic 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.8 (petrol) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 626 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 - 167 HP | 95 - 140 HP | |
Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 123 - 175 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12.5 seconds | 9.1 - 12.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.9 | 4.6 - 7.1 | |
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.61 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
Mazda 626 is 12 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 485 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1190 litres | |
Mazda 626 has 17 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`648 | ~ 1`679 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 3600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.2/10 | 9.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |