Mazda 626 1988 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.2 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 - 116 HP | 72 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 178 NM | 120 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 20.8 seconds | 10.2 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 9.2 | 6.4 - 8.7 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.38 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 32 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 626 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 372 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`066 | ~ 1`608 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |