Mazda 626 1988 vs Audi 100 1988
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda 626 is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi 100 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.2 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 - 116 HP | 69 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 178 NM | 123 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 20.8 seconds | 8.2 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 9.2 | 6.0 - 11.7 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi 100. On average, a Mazda 626 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Audi 100. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 626 is 20 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`066 | ~ 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Audi 100 has
| |