Mazda 626 1988 vs Mercedes E class 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Mazda 626 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mercedes E class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 61 - 116 HP | 75 - 220 HP | |
Torque: | 121 - 178 NM | 126 - 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 20.8 seconds | 8 - 21.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 9.2 | 7.2 - 11.9 | |
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes E class. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 17 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`066 | ~ 1`826 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | high | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 6600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |