Mazda 626 1992 vs Volvo 850 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel) | 2.3 - 2.4 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 626 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 - 116 HP | 140 - 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 - 180 NM | 206 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 15.6 seconds | 7.5 - 11 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo 850 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 626. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 8.8 | 9.1 - 9.7 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo 850. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo 850, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1315 litres | 1580 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo 850, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`783 kg | ~ 1`839 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`247 kg | ~ 1`424 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 536 kg | ~ 415 kg | |
| Mazda 626 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Volvo 850. Therefore, Mazda 626 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Volvo 850 has
| |