Mazda 626 1992 vs Mazda 626 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 626
1992 - 1997
Mazda 626
1997 - 1999
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.21.8 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 76 - 116 HP90 - 115 HP
Torque: 153 - 180 NM145 - 220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 - 15.6 seconds9.9 - 12.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.0 - 8.85.2 - 8.5
Mazda 626 1992 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626 1997. On average, Mazda 626 1992 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1997.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.58 m
Width: 1.69 m1.71 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 1992 is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 626 1997, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres502 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1315 litresno data
Mazda 626 1997 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 1992 has 72 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626 1997. This could mean that the Mazda 626 1992 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 1992 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 626 1997, which means Mazda 626 1992 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`783~ 1`709
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 800800
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 6.7/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv