Mazda 626 1992 vs Audi 80 1991

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 626
1992 - 1997
Audi 80
1991 - 1995
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 626 is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi 80 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.21.6 - 2.8

Performance

Power: 76 - 116 HP75 - 174 HP
Torque: 153 - 180 NM130 - 245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 - 15.6 seconds8.2 - 16.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.0 - 8.85.5 - 10.5
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi 80. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.48 m
Width: 1.69 m1.70 m
Height: 1.43 m1.41 m
Mazda 626 is 11 cm longer than the Audi 80, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1315 litres1200 litres
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 626 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 626 (by 115 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi 80.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`783~ 1`879
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 800800
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Audi 80 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv