Mazda 626 1998 vs Volvo V70 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda 626 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V70 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 136 HP | 126 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 220 NM | 170 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.5 seconds | 6.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.1 | 6.3 - 12.2 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller, but higher. Mazda 626 is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1677 litres | 1580 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 626 has 120 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V70. The Volvo V70 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 626 (by 97 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`844 | ~ 1`994 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |