Mazda 626 1998 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 136 HP | 90 - 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 220 NM | 138 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.5 seconds | 8 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.1 | 6.7 - 10.3 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller, but higher. Mazda 626 is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1677 litres | 1610 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`844 | ~ 1`953 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |