Mazda 626 1998 vs Skoda Octavia 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda 626 is available only with front wheel drive, while Skoda Octavia can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 136 HP | 90 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 220 NM | 145 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 13.5 seconds | 8.6 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 9.1 | 5.2 - 9.3 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. On average, a Mazda 626 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Skoda Octavia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 15 cm longer than the Skoda Octavia, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1677 litres | 1512 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`844 kg | ~ 1`841 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`313 kg | ~ 1`315 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 531 kg | ~ 526 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |