Mazda 626 1999 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 136 HP | 90 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 178 - 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | 8.5 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 9.1 | 7.2 - 10.1 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Galant. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Galant, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1677 litres | 1400 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 120 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 626 (by 277 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`866 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.2/10 | 5.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
| |