Mazda 626 1999 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 136 HP | 90 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 152 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | 11.4 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 9.1 | 5.7 - 9.2 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Premacy. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger, but lower. Mazda 626 is 38 cm longer than the Mazda Premacy, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1677 litres | 1848 litres | |
| Mazda 626 has 120 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`866 | ~ 1`784 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |