Mazda 626 1999 vs Kia Clarus 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 136 HP | 116 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 152 - 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | 10.7 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 9.1 | 9.3 - 11.1 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Clarus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller, but higher. Mazda 626 is 7 cm shorter than the Kia Clarus, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1677 litres | 1580 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 626 has 236 litres more trunk space than the Kia Clarus. The Kia Clarus may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 626 (by 97 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Clarus. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`866 | ~ 1`846 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Kia Clarus has
| |