Mazda 626 1991 vs Toyota Camry 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.4 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 - 167 HP | 152 - 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 221 NM | 218 - 273 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | 9.1 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 9.6 | 8.6 - 11.0 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Camry. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 12 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`700 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |