Mazda 626 1991 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda 626 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi Galant can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 - 167 HP | 90 - 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 - 221 NM | 178 - 363 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | 8.2 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 9.6 | 7.0 - 11.8 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Galant. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Galant, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. This could mean that the Mazda 626 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Galant (by 653 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`700 | ~ 1`851 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mitsubishi Galant has
| |