Mazda 626 1995 vs Seat Toledo 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 76 - 167 HP | 64 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 158 - 221 NM | 124 - 235 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | 8.4 - 17.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 9.3 | 5.1 - 9.7 | |
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Toledo. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
Mazda 626 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 626 is 38 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`700 | ~ 1`120 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | low | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |