Mazda 626 1995 vs Opel Vectra 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 626
1995 - 1998
Opel Vectra
1995 - 1999
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 76 - 167 HP75 - 170 HP
Torque: 158 - 221 NM128 - 230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 - 14.7 seconds8.5 - 15.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.8 - 9.35.9 - 10.7
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Vectra. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Vectra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.48 m
Width: 1.75 m1.71 m
Height: 1.39 m1.43 m
Mazda 626 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 626 is 22 cm longer than the Opel Vectra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
747 litres790 litres
Opel Vectra has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda 626 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Vectra (by 43 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight: ~ 1`700 kg~ 1`817 kg
Net weight:~ 1`234 kg~ 1`288 kg
Load capacity:~ 466 kg~ 529 kg
Mazda 626 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Opel Vectra. Therefore, Opel Vectra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 600800
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 6.2/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Opel Vectra has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv