Mazda 626 1995 vs Honda Accord 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 76 - 167 HP | 140 - 190 HP | |
Torque: | 158 - 221 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | 7.9 - 9.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 9.3 | 5.4 - 9.4 | |
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
Mazda 626 is 4 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 459 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | no data | |
Mazda 626 has 4 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Honda Accord. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`700 | ~ 1`920 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 9.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Honda Accord has
| |