Mazda 626 1995 vs Honda Accord 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda 626
1995 - 1998
Honda Accord
2005 - 2007
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.52.0 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 76 - 167 HP140 - 190 HP
Torque: 158 - 221 NM190 - 340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 - 14.7 seconds7.9 - 9.6 seconds
In general, Honda Accord are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 626. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.8 - 9.35.4 - 9.4
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.66 m
Width: 1.75 m1.76 m
Height: 1.39 m1.44 m
Mazda 626 is 4 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres459 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
747 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Honda Accord.
Gross weight: ~ 1`700 kg~ 1`920 kg
Net weight:~ 1`234 kg~ 1`378 kg
Load capacity:~ 466 kg~ 542 kg
Mazda 626 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Honda Accord. Therefore, Honda Accord is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 8001600
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 9.1/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Honda Accord has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv