Mazda 626 1995 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 76 - 167 HP | 73 - 175 HP | |
Torque: | 158 - 221 NM | 132 - 186 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | 8.4 - 16.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 9.3 | 5.8 - 8.5 | |
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Carina E. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
Mazda 626 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 626 is 17 cm longer than the Toyota Carina E, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | 1250 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. This could mean that the Mazda 626 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Carina E (by 503 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Carina E. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`700 | ~ 1`684 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | high | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |