Mazda 626 1997 vs Rover 400 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda 626 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Rover 400 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 136 HP | 75 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 220 NM | 117 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.6 seconds | 9.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.9 | 5.3 - 8.6 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 400. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger. Mazda 626 is 26 cm longer than the Rover 400, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 7320 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 132 litres more trunk space than the Rover 400. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`703 | ~ 1`642 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Rover 400 has
| |