Mazda 626 1999 vs Toyota Corolla 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 - 136 HP | 90 - 131 HP | |
Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 130 - 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.9 | 4.8 - 7.8 | |
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
Mazda 626 is 19 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 473 litres | |
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`671 | ~ 1`694 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | high | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 2400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.2/10 | 8.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |