Mazda 626 1999 vs Opel Omega 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mazda 626 is available with front wheel drive, while Opel Omega can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 5.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 136 HP | 100 - 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 203 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | 7 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.9 | 6.6 - 14.0 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 31 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage space. Mazda 626 has 28 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`671 | ~ 2`139 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |