Mazda 626 1999 vs Kia RIO 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 626 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 - 136 HP | 75 - 108 HP | |
Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 115 - 140 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | 11.6 - 14.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.9 | 7.2 - 8.7 | |
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
Mazda 626 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 626 is 37 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 499 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1277 litres | |
Mazda 626 has 3 litres more trunk space than the Kia RIO. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Kia RIO, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`671 | ~ 1`468 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Kia RIO has
| |