Mazda 6 2002 vs Rover 75 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 20 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.8 | |
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
Mazda 6 is 8 cm shorter than the Rover 75, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 432 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 432 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 6 has 68 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 75, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`030 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |