Mazda 6 2002 vs Rover 75 2004

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Rover 75
2004 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP116 HP
Torque: 310 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds11.7 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 20 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.55.8
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway1380 km on highway
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.75 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.44 m1.39 m
Mazda 6 is 8 cm shorter than the Rover 75, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 6 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres432 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data432 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 6 has 68 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. The Rover 75 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Rover 75, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9302`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 8001400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Rover 75 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv