Mazda 6 2002 vs Alfa Romeo 166 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 39 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 166, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Alfa Romeo 166. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 8.9 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 5 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 166, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`930 kg | 1`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |