Mazda 6 2002 vs Mazda 6 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 2005 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 2002 engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 6 2005, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 6 2005. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 2002 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2002 could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 2002 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda MPV | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda 5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 2005 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2002 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 6 2005, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 501 litres | |
| Mazda 6 2002 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6 2005. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |