Mazda 6 2002 vs Peugeot 406 2002

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Peugeot 406
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.7 Petrol

Performance

Power: 141 HP117 HP
Torque: 181 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds11.3 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 24 HP more power than Peugeot 406, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Peugeot 406. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.57.7
The Peugeot 406 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway1160 km on highway
Peugeot 406 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Mazda 6 2002 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.60 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 7 cm longer than the Peugeot 406, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres430 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 70 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 406.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Peugeot 406.
Gross weight (kg): 1`840no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 8001400
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Peugeot 406 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv