Mazda 6 2002 vs Jaguar X-Type 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 181 NM | 284 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar X-Type is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 90 HP less power than Jaguar X-Type, whereas torque is 103 NM less than Jaguar X-Type. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar X-Type, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar X-Type. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jaguar X-Type 2001: Vehicle has full-time all-wheel drive with 60/40 front-to-rear torque split via viscous-coupling, locking planetary differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 510'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar X-Type engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar S-Type | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda 6 2002 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
| Mazda 6 and Jaguar X-Type are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 452 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 452 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 48 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar X-Type. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.3/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Jaguar X-Type has
| |