Mazda 6 2005 vs BMW 3 series 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 166 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 207 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 4 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 3 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
690 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 16 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda Tribute | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW Z4, BMW Z3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Mazda 6 2005 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.69 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 22 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 501 litres | 440 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 61 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.8 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`905 | 1`895 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | low | |
Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |