Mazda 6 2005 vs Alfa Romeo 166 2003

 
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Alfa Romeo 166
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol3.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 147 HP220 HP
Torque: 184 NM265 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds8.6 seconds
Alfa Romeo 166 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 73 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 166, whereas torque is 81 NM less than Alfa Romeo 166. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.813.0
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres72 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 820 km in combined cycle550 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway770 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Mazda 6 2005 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.72 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 3 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 166, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 501 litres490 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 6 has 11 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 166. The Alfa Romeo 166 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8552`020
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 14003200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Alfa Romeo 166 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv