Mazda 6 2005 vs Mazda 6 2007

 
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Mazda 6
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 143 HP140 HP
Torque: 360 NM330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds10.5 seconds
Mazda 6 2005 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 2005 engine produces 3 HP more power than Mazda 6 2007, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mazda 6 2007. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.05.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Mazda 6 2007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 2005 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 2005 could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 2005 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2007.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle1140 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1280 km on highway
920 km with real consumption960 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 2007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 130 mm (5.1 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 2007 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 2007 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 390'000 km390'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years5 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.76 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2005 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 6 2007, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 501 litres519 litres
Mazda 6 2005 has 18 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6 2007.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2005 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 6 2007, which means Mazda 6 2005 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9902`035
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 12002800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv