Mazda 6 2007 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 13 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, whereas torque is 66 NM less than Volkswagen Passat CC. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 6 2007 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 6 is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat CC, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 532 litres | |
| Mazda 6 has 13 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`935 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |