Mazda 6 2010 vs Mazda 3 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 167 HP | |
Torque: | 226 NM | 228 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Mazda 6 engine produces 3 HP more power than Mazda 3, but torque is 2 NM less than Mazda 3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.7 | |
Mazda 6 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.60 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 6 is 16 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 335 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 184 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | high | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 4800 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |