Mazda 6 2010 vs Mazda 3 2009

 
Mazda 6
2010 - 2013
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 170 HP167 HP
Torque: 226 NM228 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 secondsn/a seconds
Mazda 6 engine produces 3 HP more power than Mazda 3, but torque is 2 NM less than Mazda 3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.47.7
Mazda 6 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway880 km on highway
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.60 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.47 m
Mazda 6 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda 6 is 16 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 519 litres335 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 184 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: no data10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 44003600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv