Mazda 6 2010 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda 6 engine produces 13 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| 860 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 6 2010 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 6 is 5 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat CC, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 519 litres | 532 litres | |
| Mazda 6 has 13 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |