Mazda 6 2012 vs Volvo S80 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 192 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 256 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
Mazda 6 engine produces 48 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 8.3 | |
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
1240 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
Mazda 6 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 480 litres | |
Mazda 6 has 9 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`130 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7000 | 7800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |