Mazda 6 2012 vs Mazda 6 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 192 HP | 192 HP | |
Torque: | 256 NM | 256 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
Mazda 6 2012 and Mazda 6 2015 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
By specification Mazda 6 2012 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6 2015, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
1240 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
770 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 2012 and Mazda 6 2015 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 438 litres | |
Mazda 6 2012 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 2012 has 51 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6 2015. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 2012 is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6 2015, which means Mazda 6 2012 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 7000 | 17 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
| |