Mazda 6 2012 vs Volvo S80 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 14 HP more power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 4.9 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1580 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 1820 km on highway | 1620 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
| Mazda 6 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 480 litres | |
| Mazda 6 has 9 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
| |