Mazda 6 2012 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1580 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1820 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 565 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 76 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`117 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Superb is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 6 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |