Mazda 6 2012 vs Mercedes E class 2009

 
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Mercedes E class
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.1 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP204 HP
Torque: 380 NM500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds7.2 seconds
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 54 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.96.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km7.2 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1580 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
1820 km on highway1180 km on highway
1030 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years14 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mercedes E class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.87 m
Width: 1.84 m1.85 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 and Mercedes E class are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 489 litres540 litres
Mercedes E class has more luggage space.
Mazda 6 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`390
Safety:
The Mercedes E class scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

average
Mazda 6 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes E class, so Mazda 6 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 66009800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Mercedes E klase has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv