Mazda 6 2012 vs Mercedes E class 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 204 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 500 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 54 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 6.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1580 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
1820 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
1030 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Mercedes E class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 and Mercedes E class are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 540 litres | |
Mercedes E class has more luggage space. Mazda 6 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`390 | |
Safety: | |||
The Mercedes E class scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | average | |
Mazda 6 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes E class, so Mazda 6 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 6600 | 9800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |