Mazda 6 2012 vs Jaguar XF 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 40 HP less power than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 6 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1580 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
| 1820 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller. Mazda 6 is 9 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | 540 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Mazda 6 has 51 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 scores higher in safety tests, but Jaguar XF is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 6 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |