Mazda 6 2015 vs Volvo S80 2009

 
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Volvo S80
2009 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 192 HP231 HP
Torque: 256 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 seconds7.5 seconds
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 39 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 84 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.59.6
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1010 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)148 mm (5.8 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.85 m
Width: 1.84 m1.89 m
Height: 1.45 m1.49 m
Mazda 6 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 438 litres480 litres
Volvo S80 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 42 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`160
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 17 8006200
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
Volvo S80 has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv