Mazda 6 2015 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 192 HP104 HP
Torque: 256 NM144 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 seconds13.5 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 88 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 112 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.56.3
Mazda 6 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1040 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 11 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-5Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mazda 6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.59 m
Width: 1.84 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Mazda 6 is larger.
Mazda 6 is 29 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 438 litres408 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`775
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 17 80011 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv