Mazda 6 2015 vs Mazda 3 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 192 HP | 104 HP | |
Torque: | 256 NM | 144 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 6 engine produces 88 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 112 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.3 | |
Mazda 6 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
1190 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 16 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-5 | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Mazda 6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 29 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 408 litres | |
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 6 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`775 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |