Mazda 6 2015 vs Kia Optima 2015

 
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Kia Optima
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 192 HP188 HP
Torque: 256 NM241 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 seconds9.1 seconds
Mazda 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 6 engine produces 4 HP more power than Kia Optima, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Kia Optima. Thanks to more power Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.58.3
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1120 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.86 m
Width: 1.84 m1.86 m
Height: 1.45 m1.49 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 2 cm longer than the Kia Optima, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 438 litres510 litres
Kia Optima has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 72 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Kia Optima.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`050
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 17 80012 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Kia Optima has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv