Mazda 6 2015 vs Skoda Superb 2013

 
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Skoda Superb
2013 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP152 HP
Torque: 210 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds8.7 seconds
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 2 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.17.1
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1260 km on highway1050 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ...  More about Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.84 m
Width: 1.84 m1.82 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 6 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 438 litres595 litres
Skoda Superb has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda 6 has 157 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Mazda 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9652`071
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Skoda Superb has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably better
Average price (€): 17 60016 800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Skoda Superb has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv