Mazda 6 2015 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Mazda 6
2015 - 2018
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP165 HP
Torque: 210 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds8.9 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 3, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.16.2
Mazda 6 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1260 km on highway1060 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 12 years12 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.59 m
Width: 1.84 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Mazda 6 is larger.
Mazda 6 is 29 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 438 litres419 litres
Mazda 6 has 19 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9651`815
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 17 80011 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv