Mazda 6 2015 vs Mazda 3 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 3, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.2 | |
Mazda 6 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1260 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
Mazda 6 is larger. Mazda 6 is 29 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 419 litres | |
Mazda 6 has 19 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 1`815 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 6 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |