Mazda 6 2015 vs Chrysler 200 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 187 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 234 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 200 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 6 engine produces 37 HP less power than Chrysler 200, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Chrysler 200. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 8.5 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 6 consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 200, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Renegade | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda 6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mazda 6 is smaller. Mazda 6 is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler 200, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 453 litres | |
| Mazda 6 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 200. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Chrysler 200, which means Mazda 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`965 | 2`092 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 6 has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |