Mazda 6 2002 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Volkswagen Passat
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 162 HP170 HP
Torque: 205 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds11 seconds
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 8 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.510.0
Mazda 6 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway880 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.68 m
Width: 1.78 m1.75 m
Height: 1.45 m1.50 m
Mazda 6 is larger, but lower.
Mazda 6 is 1 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 490 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1712 litresno data
Mazda 6 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0252`080
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Volkswagen Passat has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Volkswagen Passat quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001400
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Volkswagen Passat has
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv