Mazda 6 2002 vs BMW 3 series 2001

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 162 HP170 HP
Torque: 205 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds9.6 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 8 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 5 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.59.6
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 6 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 6 could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway850 km on highway
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 16 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda TributeInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW Z4, BMW Z3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.48 m
Width: 1.78 m1.74 m
Height: 1.45 m1.41 m
Mazda 6 is larger.
Mazda 6 is 21 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 490 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1712 litres1345 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 6 has 55 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 367 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.8 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mazda 6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0252`020
Safety:
Quality:
average

low
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 10002400
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv