Mazda 6 2002 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000

 
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Volkswagen Passat
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 136 HP170 HP
Torque: 310 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds9.4 seconds
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 6 engine produces 34 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, but torque is 90 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Mazda 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.49.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km10.0 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 6 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Mazda 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 6 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway820 km on highway
920 km with real consumption620 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.68 m
Width: 1.78 m1.75 m
Height: 1.45 m1.50 m
Mazda 6 is larger, but lower.
Mazda 6 is 1 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 6 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 505 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1712 litresno data
Mazda 6 has 10 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 6 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0102`020
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Volkswagen Passat has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 6, so Volkswagen Passat quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001400
Rating in user reviews: 6.3/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Volkswagen Passat has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv